The Unmanifested

One could say it is unconditioned, or unborn, because there are no objects of knowledge that can define it. It doesn’t have a shape, a colour, a context, a smell; it doesn’t have any spatial dimensions like length, breath, width, and it has no sense that time is passing by, yet it does not exclude the physical reality - all things seemingly appear as it, including relativistic time and space, and a conventional, functional self - such is the paradox.

However, it itself is not a container of all things; it doesn’t have a perimeter, nor a top or a bottom. It is boundless, yet it doesn’t stretch itself throughout space to fit into the definition of ‘boundlessness.’

No-self does not mean you merge into the environment and disappear. That is a type of severe unconsciousness. There must still exist the ability to define the physical world and its objects.

Although i have refered to it as it, it is not an ‘it’. I just used that pronoun as a transient palceholder to deliver those sentences.